A newly released YouTube documentary is stirring widespread discussion across Pakistan and abroad after presenting serious allegations against internationally known fashion designer Mehmood Bhatti. The hour-long feature delves into legal disputes, personal contradictions, and questionable claims allegedly made by Bhatti throughout his career.
Initially intended as a profile celebrating Bhatti’s journey from Pakistan to Paris, the documentary reportedly shifted focus after uncovering inconsistencies in his personal and public narratives. Among the key revelations is an ongoing property dispute between Mehmood Bhatti and his elder brother, Munir Bhatti, a senior lawyer who has practiced since the 1970s.
The documentary includes evidence showing that Mehmood granted his brother a general power of attorney in 1987 a fact he acknowledged in his autobiography. Although Bhatti later contested the property matter in court, he lost the case in 2002 and did not pursue further legal action for nearly two decades.
Another segment scrutinizes Bhatti’s philanthropic and professional claims, particularly his association with National Defence Hospital. Legal documents and statements from hospital officials reportedly contradict Bhatti’s assertion of majority ownership, instead suggesting a minor share under judicial review.
The film also examines contradictions between Bhatti’s public statements and the contents of his autobiographical books. While he has presented himself as an orphan in interviews, his own writing recounts complex family relationships, including support from his brother and a strained history with his mother. Additionally, his views on personal relationships and religion have drawn strong criticism from religious institutions, some of which have taken formal action against him.
Notably, the documentary features records of dismissed legal cases, including allegations of financial misconduct and abuse, which were not upheld in court due to lack of evidence. It also raises questions about media manipulation and the use of public platforms for personal gain.
While the documentary does not reach legal conclusions, it raises broader concerns about the influence of media narratives, the process of awarding public honors, and the need for accountability. It ends with a call for critical thinking and evidence-based judgment, urging viewers to look beyond surface-level portrayals.
As public reaction continues to unfold, the documentary has reignited debate over the responsibilities of public figures and the importance of truth in both media and personal storytelling.
